Making Moves: Professionalism, Performance, and the Mind/Body Problem in Contemporary American Dance
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Swarthmore College. Dept. of Sociology & Anthropology
Type
Thesis (B.A.)
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
en_US
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Full copyright to this work is retained by the student author. It may only be used for non-commercial, research, and educational purposes. All other uses are restricted.
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
This investigation looks at the profession of contemporary American concert dance as a
site for studying the relationship between the mind and the body. Working with Foucault's
model of the docile body, this thesis accepts the traditionally drawn line between ballet and
modem dance as a way of highlighting how Foucault's model must be extended to include the
kind of 'docility' found in professional modem dance. We examine the learning process in dance
to further understand this version of docility, and enter into a discussion of what has come to be
known as the mind-body problem. How does the way we conceptualize the relationship between
our mind and our body affect the mind-bodies we live in? We conclude that the jobs we hold
affect the people we become, not only because of the physical requirements of a career (whether
typing or sledge-hammering), but because of the way a certain career influences peoples ways of
thinking about and enacting the mind-body relationship. The ultimate thesis is that the
individual's perception of the relationship between the mind and the body is a key example of
what I will call a self-constructed-correct stance: an opinion-answer formulated by an individual
to an otherwise inaccessible question that in meaningful ways informs the 'correctness' of that
answer. Finally, we consider the implications of these stances on 'folk theory'. In a society that
privileges the mind, what happens when we ask questions - and consider answers - from the
body's perspective?