Nicaraguan Sign Language as a Realization of the Language Bioprogram

Date
2017
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Swarthmore College. Dept. of Linguistics
Type
Thesis (B.A.)
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
en_US
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Full copyright to this work is retained by the student author. It may only be used for non-commercial, research, and educational purposes. All other uses are restricted.
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
This study compares Nicaraguan Sign Language (ISN) and Hawaiian Creole English (HCE) in order to validate the realization of the Language Bioprogram in environments that lack linguistic input. Bickerton (1981) proposed the existence of such a Bioprogram that acts as a mechanism that gives humans the innate sense of what for a language should take. Some (Kegl & McWhorter, 1997) have argued that sign languages are better candidates for studying the Bioprogram because deaf children are linguistically isolated because of their inability to hear spoken language and often their lack of access to deaf and sign language education. ISN is especially suited for a study about the Language Bioprogram because its de novo emergence in the late 20th century has been documented. In this work, it is hypothesized that if HCE and ISN were both products of the Language Bioprogram, then they should have structural similarities. And overall, there is evidence that ISN and HCE do have similar underlying structures. First, both languages feature SV as the basic word order and allow for topicalization of constituents by moving them to the front of the sentences. Both languages also exhibit similar behavior in terms of relative clauses, in that such clauses are subject to the A-over-A principle as described by Chomsky (1964). Second, both languages make similar basic distinctions with regards to definiteness of NPs, tense, mood, and aspect. Third, both languages feature similar mechanisms for negation, forming interrogatives, and expressing the existential and possessive. There were some supposed Bioprogram parameters that are found in HCE, but not in ISN, but this may be explained by modality-specific effects, environmental and social effects, or language contact. The similarities between HCE and ISN may be further evidence for an innate mechanism common to all humans that sets linguistic parameters. Conversely, the differences between HCE and ISN suggest that social and environmental factors may have lasting effects on cognition and language acquisition.
Description
Subjects
Citation
Collections