Contested, and Contestable: AIDS, Pseudoscience, and the Formulation of Scientific Policy
Date
2011
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Swarthmore College. Dept. of Sociology & Anthropology
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
en_US
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Full copyright to this work is retained by the student author. It may only be used for non-commercial, research, and educational purposes. All other uses are restricted.
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
AIDS, like so many other epidemics before it, has posed a tremendous
challenge to the global public-health establishment, but it has also s
a uniquely tortured history that has been riddled with missed
opportunities and bad decisions. When AIDS first appeared in the
United States, federal funding for AIDS research was a contentious
issue due to a perceived connection between AIDS and homosexuality,
and homophobic sentiment impeded government action on AIDS until the
eventual appearance of AIDS in the heterosexual population removed
some of AIDS’s stigma. Then, two decades later, South African
President Thabo Mbeki based his nation’s public health response to
AIDS on the demonstrably false belief, advocated by the American
biologist Peter Duesberg, that HIV was not the cause of AIDS, causing
untold damage.
This thesis analyzes the social dimensions of the global AIDS
epidemic, paying special attention to the pseudoscience that shaped
government AIDS policy in South Africa. Through a comparative analysis
with other pseudoscientific movements, a taxonomy of pseudoscience is
assembled. We see that pseudoscience owes much of its popularity to a
mistrust of science and to a perception that scientific consensus is
somehow unreliable; additionally, the rise of the internet has
facilitated the circulation of pseudoscience and has made it likely
that, going forward, pseudoscientific movements will play an
increasingly prominent role in debates over, and the formulation of,
scientific policy.