The Perils of Imagination: Why Historians Don't Like Counterfactuals
| dc.contributor.author | Burke, Timothy, 1964- | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-06T14:37:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-05-06T14:37:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-02-10 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Counterfactuals are studies of might-have-beens, events that could have happened. Counterfactual thinking has an important place in human cognition and behavior and is accordingly studied by some psychologists. There are other academic disciplines like philosophy that also see counterfactuals as an important legitimate area of inquiry. Historians, however, have often viewed counterfactuals with wariness at best, contempt at worst. That is, when they think about them at all. Tim Burke will talk about why he nevertheless finds it useful to teach a course on counterfactual history and describe the current state of play in the debate among historians and other social scientists about "might-have-beens." Among other points, he hopes to show how the discussion of counterfactuals illustrates history's uneasy location in the borderlands between the social sciences and the humanities. | en_US |
| dc.description.note | Part of the Second Tuesday Social Science Cafe series. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Swarthmore College. Dept. of History | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Frank Aydelotte Foundation for the Advancement of the Liberal Arts | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10066/15970 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Swarthmore College | |
| dc.title | The Perils of Imagination: Why Historians Don't Like Counterfactuals | en_US |
| dc.type.dcmi | Sound |