Institutional Scholarship

Balancing Sustainable Development: Philosophy of Technology and Aesthetic Evaluation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Wright, Kathleen, 1944-
dc.contributor.advisor Gangadean, Ashok K., 1941-
dc.contributor.author Gasperik, Dylan
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-30T18:05:09Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-30T18:05:09Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10066/3728
dc.description.abstract My thesis is an attempt to explain the imbalanced and incomplete modes of thinking in the modern consciousness that I find to be responsible for humanity's collective irrational and violent destruction of the global environment. I argue that the environment is a direct material extension of human identities and its destruction is evidence of unbalanced behavior and thinking in need of rehabilitation. Furthermore, the discourse of sustainable development fails to provide an adequate alternative to the destructiveness of the modern consciousness. My thesis draws on three distinct traditions of thought to attempt to analyze the imbalance and propose an alternate mode of thinking: Albert Borgmann's "device paradigm," Martin Heidegger's "supreme danger" of modern technology, and David Hall and Roger Ames' "aesthetic cosmology" reading of the classical Taoist texts. The device paradigm highlights the important role of technology in distracting us from the destruction that has become so unavoidable and innocuous in the modern lifestyle. Heidegger's complex analysis of technology provides a foundation for understanding its power for salvation as well as destruction and distraction. Hall and Ames' readings of Taoism provide an example of an alternate mode of thinking that could potentially rehabilitate the imbalances endemic to the modern consciousness that cause us to be destructive. I am aware of and wary of the breadth and ambition of my thesis topic. This has not deterred me or distracted me from writing it, and I have found the process to be helpful in solidifying, clarifying, and justifying my philosophical explorations up to this point.
dc.description.sponsorship Haverford College. Department of Philosophy
dc.language.iso eng
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/
dc.subject.lcsh Sustainable development -- Philosophy
dc.subject.lcsh Sustainable development -- Moral and ethical aspects
dc.title Balancing Sustainable Development: Philosophy of Technology and Aesthetic Evaluation
dc.type Thesis
dc.rights.access Open Access


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/

Search


Browse

My Account