dc.contributor.advisor |
Dorsey, Bruce |
|
dc.contributor.advisor |
Azfar, Farid |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lane, Heather |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-08-03T18:04:43Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-08-03T18:04:43Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10066/23731 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper explores the rhetoric of the woman suffrage movement from a
historical perspective. It maintains that suffragists were making arguments about justice
and rights much more often—and for longer--than previous historians believed, and that
such arguments appear to have been relatively useful in arguing for suffrage. It focuses
on the late 19th through the very early 20th century, a period in which previous historians
have claimed the “justice” argument was growing thin. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
Swarthmore College. Dept. of History |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Full copyright to this work is retained by the student author. It may only be used for non-commercial, research, and educational purposes. All other uses are restricted. |
|
dc.title |
The Space Between “Justice” and “Expediency” in Woman’s Suffrage Speech, 1870-1920 |
en_US |
dc.rights.access |
No restrictions |
en_US |