Institutional Scholarship

Questioning the Meritocracy: Investigating System Change Motivation in White Americans

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Lei, Ryan Scott, Charlotte 2021-07-16T19:44:39Z 2021-07-16T19:44:39Z 2021
dc.description.abstract Based on the work of Johnson and Fujita (2012) and Stevens et al. (2008), this study investigated a method through which to activate system-change motivation in White American liberals and moderates. Using articles about the Biden administration's policy plans, we manipulated the level of perceived changeability in United States systems and participants' sense of inclusion (regular or all-inclusive multiculturalism). Contrary to our hypotheses, change and multiculturalism conditions had no main effects on our dependent variables except support for increased minimum wage. Exploratory analyses indicated multiple interaction effects between changeability condition and participants' perceived positivity of the changes. When the U.S. was presented as a changeable system, participants who rated the possible changes more positively scored lower on measures of system-legitimizing beliefs and indicated more support for progressive policies. These changes may represent the activation of system-change motivation. Overall, we conclude that there are complex relationships between changeability, multiculturalism, and perceived positivity of changes, but that our work shows tentative support for the existence of a system-change motivation. Limitations and directions for future study of system-change motivation are discussed.
dc.description.sponsorship Haverford College. Department of Psychology
dc.language.iso eng
dc.title Questioning the Meritocracy: Investigating System Change Motivation in White Americans
dc.type Thesis
dc.rights.access Tri-College users only

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as



My Account