"Brought Up Among Their Own People": Mixed Race Families and Custody in the Post-Civil Rights Era
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of History
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Open Access
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
Although the United States' legal system has always contended with families which crossed racial boundaries, the legalization of interracial marriage in 1967 and the accompanying civil rights era significantly altered the legal and social status of these families. In the era that followed, family courts across the country struggled to account for the racial composition of these families when they became involved in custody disputes. The mid- to late-1970s and the early-1980s provide a number of informative court cases which dealt with questions about mixed race families in custody disputes. In 1984, one case even rose to the level of the United States Supreme Court. These cases are largely notable for their diversity and inconsistency, so it is difficult to make definitive statements about what these cases demonstrate about race in this period. That said, the cases do reveal a debate about how to evaluate the harms of racial discrimination when determining a child's best interests. While some courts deemed the harms of racial discrimination to be important in deciding a child's living situation, others suggested that ignoring the issue of race would result in better outcomes for both society and for children themselves. Using evolving doctrines of social science and changing terminology, courts did their best to offer definitive legal standards on the use of race in custody cases but, in the end, often left the questions they confronted unanswered.