Religion as a Way of Life: Determining conceptions of religion in the Wisconsin v. Yoder opinions
Date
2019
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Advisor
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Religion
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Bi-College users only
Terms of Use
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religion, but nowhere in the religion clauses or even in the Constitution does a clear definition of ‘religion’ exist. This poses a problem to justices trying to determine what kinds of beliefs are ‘religious’ free exercise cases and can receive protections. In this paper I look at how they rely on their own conceptions of religion to make decisions that affect the abilities of others to practice theirs. To determine what these conceptions look like, I engage in a close reading of the language in the Wisconsin v. Yoder opinions, as well as in the arguments made in related cases. This analysis has revealed that the rhetoric of the opinions in each free exercise decision has an impact on how religions and religious groups are treated by the public, which in turn affects how individual biases towards religion are shaped.
Description
Oona Ryle was a Bryn Mawr College student.