Hatab’s Nietzschean Defense of Democracy: a Post-Modern Experiment in Political Theory and Its Relevancy in Understanding Nietzsche.

Date
2007
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Producer
Director
Performer
Choreographer
Costume Designer
Music
Videographer
Lighting Designer
Set Designer
Crew Member
Funder
Rehearsal Director
Concert Coordinator
Moderator
Panelist
Alternative Title
Department
Haverford College. Department of Philosophy
Type
Thesis
Original Format
Running Time
File Format
Place of Publication
Date Span
Copyright Date
Award
Language
eng
Note
Table of Contents
Terms of Use
Rights Holder
Access Restrictions
Haverford users only
Tripod URL
Identifier
Abstract
Friedrich Nietzsche’s thoughts have had an enormous effect on contemporary discourse and are recognized to be a primary source for postmodernism, which critiques philosophical ideas from the Enlightenment. Lawrence J. Hatab, in his book A Nietzschean Defense of Democracy: an Experiment in Postmodern Politics, claims that Nietzsche was wrong to repudiate democracy, and claims to use his theories to create a political model that he should have preferred democracy to any other political arrangement if it was in the spirit of his own thinking. In the body of this paper, I will first discuss the inevitable difficulties of a post-modern democracy, and then examine several pragmatic dilemmas with Hatab’s theoretical foundation for a democratic system in his project. Next, I will highlight the internal conflicts Hatab’s analysis has with Nietzsche’s work, and bring to light egalitarian undercurrents that he uses to allow his political theory to avoid practical problems. Then, I will discus how we should look at Nietzsche in the first place and how we should read his advice on political concerns. I will end by discussing what benefit we can gain from engaging in this discussion, and what we can learn from looking at Nietzsche when conferring political questions.
Description
Citation
Collections